What is Anthropic?
Tools, assistants and prompting
Anthropic is the company behind Claude. It describes itself as an AI safety and research company and develops frontier AI systems that it deploys through products, APIs and partnerships. For businesses, Anthropic matters as the provider whose terms, privacy defaults, retention rules and safety approach shape how Claude can be adopted.
Reviewed by Jackie, Head of Learning & Development, Levellers · Last reviewed 8 June 2026
What this means
Anthropic is an AI safety and research company that builds frontier AI systems and deploys them through products and partnerships. For most businesses, the practical sign that they are dealing with Anthropic is Claude, its AI product family, plus the contract, privacy and platform documentation that sit behind it.
That means Anthropic is the provider, while Claude is the product. A business might encounter Anthropic through the Claude app, the Anthropic API, or Claude offered through another infrastructure layer.
Why it matters
Provider identity matters because it shapes the commercial and governance baseline. Anthropic says it builds reliable, interpretable and steerable AI systems, and it publishes company-level safety and scaling materials alongside product and privacy documentation. For organisations assessing an AI provider, those company materials matter for due diligence even if day-to-day users only see Claude.
Anthropic also gives commercial customers explicit default statements on training and retention. Those policies affect legal review, procurement, architecture and workflow design, especially where internal documents, code or personal data are involved.
How it works
Anthropic develops models and then deploys them through products, partnerships and developer surfaces. Its docs show customers can access Claude through direct Messages APIs or Managed Agents, and can also use partner infrastructure options such as AWS Bedrock, Google Cloud Vertex AI and Microsoft Foundry.
On governance, Anthropic publishes a Responsible Scaling Policy that it describes as a voluntary framework for managing catastrophic risks from advanced AI systems. That does not replace an adopter's own controls, but it is relevant context when assessing provider posture.
Examples
In practice, choosing Anthropic usually means choosing the route by which Claude will be used: a staff-facing assistant, coding and research support, or an API-backed step in a wider workflow. Anthropic's company and product pages point to uses in coding, research, analysis and document-heavy work, while the platform docs support model access, tools and managed agents.
Work assistant: a team uses Claude in a managed workspace for document review or briefing support.
Developer route: an internal system calls Anthropic's APIs to classify, extract or draft inside a business process.
Provider due diligence: legal, security and delivery teams review Anthropic's privacy defaults, retention model and safety materials before broader rollout.
Common misunderstandings
Anthropic is not the same as Claude. Claude is the product family; Anthropic is the company that develops and operates it. It is also wrong to assume that a provider's safety positioning removes the need for your own governance, review design and data controls.
Another misunderstanding is that using Claude through any route gives the same technical and commercial setup. Anthropic's docs distinguish between direct platform surfaces, managed-agent surfaces and partner infrastructure options, and those routes can change what your team needs to review.
Risks and boundaries
If Anthropic is being considered for sensitive work, review the provider-level promises as well as the workflow design. Anthropic says commercial inputs and outputs are not used for training by default, while standard API retention is typically up to 30 days unless a different feature, agreement, legal requirement or misuse review applies.
The ICO and NIST guidance still apply around governance, data minimisation and meaningful human review where appropriate. In other words, a provider's published safety framework is useful context, but it does not remove the adopter's need to design checks, approvals and logs around real work.
What to do next
Create a short provider review checklist before comparing demos. Note the product route, business-data training default, retention needs, approval points, security expectations and whether you are buying a staff-facing assistant or building an integrated workflow. Then compare Anthropic with adjacent entries such as OpenAI and ChatGPT at the workflow level, not only at the brand level.
Have a question or a suggestion, or want to understand how we research and review these guides? Read about our editorial standards and how to reach us.
FAQs
Is Anthropic the same as Claude?
No. Anthropic is the company. Claude is Anthropic's product family and platform surface for end users and developers.
What does Anthropic actually provide?
Anthropic provides AI products and developer access to its models, including direct message-based access, managed-agent options and partner deployment routes.
Does Anthropic train on commercial customer data by default?
Anthropic says it does not use inputs or outputs from commercial products such as Claude for Work and the Anthropic API to train models by default.
Does Anthropic publish a public safety framework?
Yes. Anthropic publishes a Responsible Scaling Policy and describes it as a voluntary framework for managing catastrophic risks from advanced AI systems.