What is AI regulation in Dominica?

AI regulation: countries and regions

The Commonwealth of Dominica has no dedicated AI law, no AI bill, no national AI strategy and no AI regulator. It has also not enacted a data protection statute and has no data protection authority. AI use is governed only indirectly, through constitutional privacy rights, a few electronic transactions and evidence statutes, and a National Digital Transformation Strategy that is a development plan rather than regulation. The most durable architecture sits at the regional level, where a harmonised Eastern Caribbean data protection bill is still being developed.

Reviewed by Jackie, Head of Learning & Development, Levellers · Last reviewed 8 June 2026

What this means

There is no law in Dominica that names or governs artificial intelligence, and no public body charged with overseeing it. For anyone deploying AI in the country, this is close to an empty regulatory field. There is no AI statute, no AI bill before Parliament, and no published national AI strategy or policy. Unusually, Dominica also has no general data protection law. As at early 2025, the country had not enacted comprehensive data protection legislation, and there is no information commissioner or data protection authority. Personal data is protected only by the privacy provisions in the Constitution and by the government's own website privacy policy. This matters because, in most countries, data protection law is the main lever through which AI is regulated in practice. Dominica does not yet have that lever. What does exist is a development roadmap, the National Digital Transformation Strategy 2022 to 2026, and a handful of electronic commerce and evidence statutes. Beyond the national level, Dominica sits inside CARICOM, the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) and the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union, where a harmonised data protection bill is being developed. That regional work, not domestic legislation, is where the durable governance architecture is most likely to come from.

Why it matters

For organisations deploying or governing AI touching Dominica, the practical position is that there are no AI-specific obligations to meet, and very little domestic data law either. That sounds permissive, but it carries its own risks. There is no statutory framework to demonstrate compliance against, no regulator to give guidance, and no data subject rights regime to design around, which leaves organisations relying on contract, constitutional norms and their own internal standards. It also means the de facto benchmark is external. Because the forthcoming regional data protection bill is expected to follow international, GDPR-style standards, organisations that build mature data governance now will be far better placed when a statute eventually passes. The realistic stakes are not today's local compliance burden, which is minimal, but readiness: the legal floor in Dominica is low now and is likely to rise through regional harmonisation, so anyone with a long-running deployment should plan for rules that do not yet exist.

How it works

No AI-specific law or regulator

Dominica has not enacted or proposed any statute, regulation or binding policy specific to artificial intelligence, and no government agency holds an AI oversight mandate. There is no AI risk-classification regime, no algorithmic transparency duty and no AI liability rule. Existing digital and electronic commerce laws would apply incidentally to AI systems that process personal data or generate electronic records, but none addresses automated decision-making, profiling or high-risk AI as such.

No data protection statute, only constitutional privacy

Dominica has not passed a national data protection law. As at February 2025, the Commonwealth of Dominica had not enacted comprehensive data protection legislation, and the government's official laws register lists no Data Protection Act. There is consequently no data protection authority, no registration regime for data controllers, and no statutory data subject rights such as access, rectification, erasure or portability. Privacy protection rests on two thin foundations: the fundamental rights provisions in Dominica's Constitution, which protect the privacy of home and property, and the Government of Dominica's website Privacy and Security Policy, which covers only personal information collected through official online platforms. Claims circulating on some commercial websites that Dominica has a Data Protection Act of 2011 are not supported by any official source and appear to confuse a regional model template with enacted national law.

The National Digital Transformation Strategy 2022 to 2026

The principal national digital instrument is the National Digital Transformation Strategy 2022 to 2026, published in November 2022 by the Ministry of Public Works, Public Utilities and the Digital Economy with United Nations Development Programme support. It is a development and modernisation roadmap, not a regulatory instrument. Built around three pillars, People, Business and Government, it commits to updating regulations to safeguard data privacy, cybersecurity and electronic commerce, and to deliver digital identity and secure data exchange systems. Implementation is supported by the Caribbean Digital Transformation Project, a World Bank financed regional project coordinated by the OECS Commission. The strategy signals an intention to modernise data and cyber law, but it does not itself create AI rules or binding data protection duties.

Adjacent electronic commerce and evidence statutes

Dominica has enacted several statutes that touch digital activity without addressing AI. The Electronic Evidence Act of 2010 governs the recognition and admissibility of electronic records. The Electronic Transactions Act of 2013 and the Electronic Funds Transfer Act of 2013 establish the legal validity of electronic transactions and signatures. An Electronic Crimes Bill from 2013 is not yet in force. The Telecommunications Act of 2000 established the National Telecommunications Regulatory Commission, and Dominica also participates in the regional telecoms regulator, ECTEL. None of these instruments regulates AI or automated processing directly.

The regional layer: CARICOM, OECS and the ECCU

Because Dominica's domestic framework is thin, the most durable governance architecture relevant to it is regional. Dominica is a member of CARICOM, the OECS and the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU). The CARICOM Single ICT Space aims for harmonised regional ICT policy, legal and regulatory regimes, including compatible data protection. The ITU and CARICOM HIPCAR project produced model legislative texts, including one on privacy and data protection, available to Dominica as a template. Most significantly, the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank, working with the OECS Commission, is developing a harmonised ECCU Data Protection and Privacy Bill; in March 2025 the central bank published a policy document setting out considerations for that legislation and stressing the need for harmonised rules across member states. That bill is still in development and has not been enacted in any ECCU state, including Dominica. Separately, an ECTEL Electronic Communications Bill intended to replace the Telecommunications Act has been passed by some Eastern Caribbean states but not yet by Dominica.

Examples

A fintech offering an AI-driven credit or fraud tool to customers in Dominica finds no AI law to comply with and, unusually, no general data protection statute either. Its real constraints are contractual commitments, constitutional privacy norms, the electronic transactions and evidence statutes for record-keeping, and any standards imposed by international partners or payment networks, rather than a domestic data protection regime. A government modernisation programme implementing digital identity or secure data exchange under the National Digital Transformation Strategy operates as a development project rather than under an AI or data protection law. If AI features such as automated triage are added, governance flows through the responsible ministry and the regional project framework, not through any AI-specific statute, which does not exist. A regional insurer running a single AI underwriting platform across the Eastern Caribbean cannot rely on a Dominican data protection law because there is none. The prudent approach is to design to the GDPR-style standard expected from the forthcoming harmonised ECCU bill, so that the same controls satisfy both current best practice and the regime likely to arrive.

Common misunderstandings

"Dominica has an AI law." It does not. There is no AI statute, bill, regulator or national AI strategy specific to artificial intelligence. "Dominica and the Dominican Republic share the same rules." They are different countries with different frameworks. References to a National AI Strategy, ENIA, Law 172-13 or a presidential decree concern the Dominican Republic, not the Commonwealth of Dominica. "Dominica has a data protection law." It does not. As at early 2025 it had not enacted comprehensive data protection legislation, and there is no data protection authority. Claims of a 2011 Data Protection Act are unsupported by official sources. "The National Digital Transformation Strategy regulates AI." It does not. It is a development roadmap that commits to updating data and cyber law in future, not a regulatory instrument that creates binding AI or data protection duties. "CARICOM or the OECS already imposes binding AI rules on Dominica." They do not. The CARICOM Single ICT Space and the ECCU harmonised data protection bill set regional direction and templates, but the bill is still in development and not yet enacted anywhere in the currency union.

Risks and boundaries

This article describes a jurisdiction with no dedicated AI framework and no general data protection statute, so it cannot tell you how to comply with either. The central boundary is that domestic law is close to silent on both AI and data protection, leaving constitutional privacy provisions and a few electronic commerce statutes as the only national instruments. The position is partly evidenced by absence: the strongest confirmation that Dominica has not enacted data protection law comes from a regional academic data protection office and is corroborated by the absence of any such Act in the government's official laws register, since governments rarely publish positive statements about laws they have not passed. The regional workstreams are genuinely active but unsettled: the ECCU harmonised data protection bill and the ECTEL Electronic Communications Bill could change status, and their eventual scope, timing and adoption into Dominican law are not confirmed. A standalone AI law is neither present nor on any published legislative agenda and should not be expected in the near term. This is general information, not legal advice; anyone with material exposure should take qualified local advice and recheck the position, because the regional picture is moving.

What to do next

Do not assume any AI-specific compliance obligations exist in Dominica, because there are none today. Anchor your planning instead on constitutional privacy norms, the electronic transactions and evidence statutes for contracting and record-keeping, and voluntary alignment with GDPR-style best practice, which is the de facto regional benchmark. Treat a recognised data protection standard as your design baseline. Because the forthcoming harmonised ECCU bill is expected to follow international standards, organisations that build GDPR-style data governance now, covering lawful basis, transparency, security and individual rights, will adapt cheaply when a statute passes. Monitor three specific triggers that would change the picture: enactment of the ECCU harmonised Data Protection and Privacy Bill and its adoption into Dominican law; passage of the ECTEL Electronic Communications Bill by Dominica's Parliament; and any move by the responsible ministry to deliver the updated data privacy and cybersecurity legislation promised in the Digital Transformation Strategy. For anything consequential or cross-border, take local advice rather than relying on a generic regional view.

Have a question or a suggestion, or want to understand how we research and review these guides? Read about our editorial standards and how to reach us.

FAQs

Does Dominica have a dedicated AI law?

No. There is no AI statute, AI bill, national AI strategy or AI regulator in the Commonwealth of Dominica.

Does Dominica have a data protection law?

No. As at early 2025 Dominica had not enacted comprehensive data protection legislation, and there is no data protection authority. Privacy rests on constitutional provisions and a government website privacy policy.

Is Dominica the same as the Dominican Republic?

No. They are different countries. A national AI strategy, ENIA and related decrees belong to the Dominican Republic, not to the Commonwealth of Dominica.

What laws apply to AI in Dominica today?

Only indirectly relevant ones: constitutional privacy rights and electronic transactions, funds transfer and evidence statutes. None addresses AI or automated decision-making directly.

What is the National Digital Transformation Strategy 2022 to 2026?

It is a development roadmap published in November 2022 by the responsible ministry with UN Development Programme support. It commits to modernising data and cyber rules but does not itself regulate AI.

Where will Dominica's data protection rules come from?

Most likely from regional harmonisation. The Eastern Caribbean Central Bank and the OECS Commission are developing a harmonised ECCU Data Protection and Privacy Bill, which is not yet enacted.

Are there any binding regional AI rules for Dominica?

No. CARICOM and OECS work sets direction and provides model templates, but there is no binding regional AI law, and the harmonised data protection bill is still in development.

What should an organisation do while rules are absent?

Align voluntarily with GDPR-style data governance, rely on contract and constitutional norms, document an AI risk approach, and monitor the regional bills and the strategy's promised legislation.

Sources